Which best describes the outcome of the 1913 case Guinn v. U.S.?
The case represented a failure for the NAACP because it supported a law that limited the voting rights of formerly enslaved individuals.
The case represented a failure for the NAACP because it overturned a law that guaranteed equal voting rights for all Americans.
The case was a victory for the NAACP because it overturned a law that would have limited African American voting rights.
The case was a victory for the NAACP because it supported an existing law that upheld African American voting rights.

Respuesta :

Answer:

The case represented a failure for the NAACP because it overturned a law that guaranteed equal voting rights for all Americans.

Explanation:

The outcome of the Guinn v. U.S. case was the victory of the NAACP that come with the limited voting rights to the African Americans.

What was Guinn v. United States, 1913 case?

In 1913s the Grandfather clause was introduced in the U.S. constitution that allowed the literacy test to be performed by the individuals to be allowed to vote, or with the ancestors having the voting rights can also vote.

The rule made the whites to be eligible to vote, while the illiterate blacks were not regarded the equality for voting.

In 1913,  John W. Davis as United States Solicitor General briefed the case for the equal voting rights, from  National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).

However, the decision to the case was the null and void of the Grandfather clause, and the NAACP granted the voting rights to the American Africans. Thus, statement C is correct.

Learn more about Guinn v. U.S. case, here:

https://brainly.com/question/10097707

ACCESS MORE