Question

Read Chief Justice Warren's decision from the Miranda case.

The entire thrust of police interrogation ... was to put the defendant in such an emotional state as to impair his

capacity for rational judgment. ... [The choice on his part to speak to the police-was not made knowingly.

What did Chief Justice Warren say about how Miranda's confession was made?

Miranda was aware of his rights when he made his confession

Miranda incriminated himself intentionally and knowingly.

Miranda was unaware of his rights but his confession could be used.

Miranda incriminated himself without knowing that he could refuse to do so.

Answer 1

Chief Justice Earl Warren stated that Miranda's confession was like this: D. Miranda incriminated himself without knowing that he could refuse to do so.

What was the Miranda Decision?

The Miranda decision made by the Supreme Court in 1966 overruled the prosecution's introduction of Miranda's confession as evidence in the criminal trial.

The reason for this decision is that the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.

Thus, Chief Justice Earl Warren stated that D. Miranda incriminated himself without knowing that he could refuse to do so.

Learn more about the Miranda Decision at https://brainly.com/question/727854