Review the description.
John Ruskin, in his essay "Work," claims that there are two kinds of people in the world, and offers the following reasoning in support of his claim.

But in every nation, as I said, there is a vast class who are cowardly and more or less stupid. And with these people, just as certainly the fee is first and the work second, as with brave people the work is first and the fee second.

Which best evaluates the support Ruskin offers for his claim?





It is logical; most people are indeed cowardly and overvalue money.

It is logical; a person can still be cowardly even if they work hard.

It is not logical; the author ignores other possibilities—that people value their family's welfare above work and money, for example.

It is not logical; the author himself is writing an essay in exchange for money.

PLEASE HELP!!

Respuesta :

I am 96% sure that the answer is 
It is not logical; the author ignores other possibilities—that people value their family's welfare above work and money, for example.

THis is because some people may love family more. 
If it is wrong do not be mad at me. I forgot the answer to it.

I took the test and I got that it is not logical the author ignores other possibilities that value their family’s welfare above work and money, for example.

ACCESS MORE
EDU ACCESS
Universidad de Mexico