Respuesta :
Answer:
- To persuade the judge and the listening courtroom audience that the death penalty is too horrible, even for ruthless killers like Leopold and Loeb.
Explanation:
In 1924, Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb were sentenced for slaughtering a fourteen-year-old neighbor kid. Leopold and Loeb were in their late adolescents, originated from rich families, and went to school. They needed to carry out the "flawless wrongdoing." Attorney Clarence Darrow, a lifetime adversary of capital punishment, was their guard lawyer.
It was declared that a large number of dollars were to be spent on this case. Wild and luxurious stories were openly distributed as though they were certainty. Here was to be a push to spare the lives of two young men, that ought not have required an exertion even, however to spare their lives by the utilization of cash, in breathtaking sums, for example, these families never had nor could have.
In 1924, Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb were sentenced for slaughtering a fourteen-year-old neighbor kid.
Leopold and Loeb were in their late adolescents, originated from rich families, and went to school.
They needed to carry out the "flawless wrongdoing." Attorney Clarence Darrow, a lifetime adversary of capital punishment, was their guard lawyer.
Which statement best describes Darrow’s purpose for this text?
Wild and luxurious stories were openly distributed as though they were a certainty. Here was to be a push to spare the lives of two young men, that ought not to have required an exertion even, however, to spare their lives by the utilization of cash, in breathtaking sums, for example, these families never had nor could have.
For more information about Darrow, refer to the link:-
brainly.com/question/14445666