Respuesta :
This is a disadvantage of the "team" approach to departmentalization.
Teams are divided into two different types of teams, that are;Cross-functional teams and permanent teams.Cross-functional teams comprise of representatives from different functional divisions who are dependable to meet as group and resolve shared issues. While colleagues still answer to their functional manager, they will likewise answer to the group, maybe to a group or team leader.Permanent teamss comprise of team of representatives who are united as a formal office. Like a divisional structure, although considerably littler in the quantity of representatives included, permanent teams are frequently the consequence of re-engineering.There are also disadvantages of team approach which incorporate dual loyalties and struggle, the time and assets spent on teams, and unintended/ineffectual decentralization, which may happen in light of the fact that colleagues don't have the calculated aptitudes to be compelling.
Teams are divided into two different types of teams, that are;Cross-functional teams and permanent teams.Cross-functional teams comprise of representatives from different functional divisions who are dependable to meet as group and resolve shared issues. While colleagues still answer to their functional manager, they will likewise answer to the group, maybe to a group or team leader.Permanent teamss comprise of team of representatives who are united as a formal office. Like a divisional structure, although considerably littler in the quantity of representatives included, permanent teams are frequently the consequence of re-engineering.There are also disadvantages of team approach which incorporate dual loyalties and struggle, the time and assets spent on teams, and unintended/ineffectual decentralization, which may happen in light of the fact that colleagues don't have the calculated aptitudes to be compelling.
