Which reasons below explain why the Anti-Federalists objected to the Constitution? Check all that apply

Power would be too centralized.
A bill of rights was included.
States would become less powerful.
A bill of rights was not included.
States would become more powerful.

Respuesta :

The following are the correct answers:


1) Power would be too centralized- Anti-federalists were a group of individuals who thought that a strong central (aka federal) government would result in tyranny. This sense of paranoia was a result of the treatment American colonists received while under the control of a strong British government.


2) States would become less powerful- Anti-federalists felt that state governments should have the most power. This group felt that state governments understood their citizens better and were more aware of their needs in comparison to a big central government.


3)A Bill of Rights was not included.- Without a Bill of Rights, Anti-federalists were worried that a strong central government would start taking away the rights of American citizens.

The Anti-Federalists were against the implementation of the Constitution as the government power would become too centralized. The states would have less power in their hand and the bill of rights was not part of the constitution.

The constitution of the US was initiated in the year 1787, which Anti-Federalists opposed due to the following reasons:

  • Anti-Federalists do not want the central government to hold the entire power as it might result in tyranny just as the British government controlled the US.
  • Anti-Federalists were of perspective that state government know citizens more as compared to the central government. Therefore, the constitution was not giving them much power to serve citizens' needs.
  • Anti-Federalists were demanding a bill of rights that will protect the civil and human rights of the citizens.

Learn more about the US constitution here:

https://brainly.com/question/17634690