Respuesta :
- a claim about sumo wrestlers and cheating - Levitt and Dubner try to answer the question "What do schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers have in common?" in the first chapter. They answer the question through the ways of incentives.
- evidence to support wrestler cheating - The incentive that makes sumo wrestlers to cheat is observed as a similar case of cheating in teachers of Chicago public schools.
- a conclusion that wrestlers tend to cheat - The study shows that sumo wrestlers tend to cheat when it is advantageous for them
- a question about the morality of humankind - Then, the writers ask a general question and search for an answer.
- an example about morality in business - The authors write about a bagel experiment.
- a conclusion that most people are moral - And they conclude that most people actually honest which it confirms Adam Smith's idea on morality.
These elements of Levitt and Dubner’s argument have been arranged in sequential order as follows:
- A claim about sumo wrestlers and cheating.
- Evidence to support wrestler cheating.
- A conclusion that wrestlers tend to cheat.
- A question about the morality of humankind.
- An example about morality in business.
- A conclusion that most people are moral.
What is the Order of an Argument?
The order of an argument refers to the manner and sequence in which the thoughts in the argument are arranged. In Freakonomics by Levitt and Dubner we see the pattern of thoughts that were used by the authors to understand the morality of people.
A claim was first established about the encouragement that incentives give to cheating. The sumo wrestlers were used to illustrate this. The more the matches, the higher their ranks.
Subsequently, a conclusion, question, example, and conclusion were reached.
Learn more about arguments here:
https://brainly.com/question/3775579