Respuesta :
Leslie Stahl summarize the "conundrum" of the minimum-21 drinking law by proposing that the "conundrum" or confusing problem is that a law that has diminished highway deaths might add to an expansion in off roadway deaths.
Leslie advises that conundrum is that legal process which has decreased the highway deaths contributing to the addition in off-highway deaths.
Further Explanation:
The minimum age of drinking in the United States issue has raised debate over the past several decades. In the 1970s state reduce the age from 21 to 18, 19 or 20. But this reduction of age has led to car crashes. Then a state-led movement started in the late nineteen seventies to increase the age back to 21. Through a federal policy, incentives were given to all the state governments to implement this law of increasing the age to 21. With depth, research act was passed in 1984 known as the national minimum legal drinking age act. There were two conditions put before the state government first is to increase the age to 21 and the other was to face the loss of highway funds. By the time of 1988, all the states have implemented this policy. Initially, 29 states increased the age in between 1970 and 1975. But later on, there was an increase in traffic crashes among the youth of age 18 to 20 years. Michigan was the first state to increase the age to 21 in 1978 followed by 17 other states from1980 to 1985.
Learn more:
1. How did California differ from the United States in terms of interactions of whites and natives?
https://brainly.com/question/7248802
2. Which issue did the Supreme Court answer in the case of Duncan v. Louisiana?
https://brainly.com/question/8891404
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Topic: Conundrum
Subject: Social Science
Keywords: Car crashes, Federal policy, national minimum legal drinking age act, Highway funds, traffic crashes, Michigan.
