Supporters of the youthful dissidents saluted the Court choice that "understudies are qualified for opportunity of articulation of their
sees." Critics who contradicted the wearing of the armbands anticipated hurtful outcomes.
Equity Hugo Black disagreed from the dominant part assessment. He recommended that the Court's choice was "the start of a
new progressive time of tolerance in this nation encouraged by the legal." He contended that nobody has a total
appropriate to the right to speak freely and articulation.
Later choices, for example,
Bethel School District
v.
Fraser
(1986) and
Hazelwood School District
v.
Kuhlmeier
(1988),
limited
understudies' First Amendment rights. These
decisions by their inclination likewise extended the specialist of school authorities.
