Question

If a Supreme Court justice were to argue using a precedent, what might he or she do?

A. Research decisions that were made in lower courts on the same case

B. Present views that oppose his or her own in order to show all possible outcomes

C. Cite other cases that came to similar conclusions

D. Practice making judgments on cases that are different from the current case

Answer 1

If a supreme court justice were to argue using precedent, they would start by citing other cases that came to a similar conclusion. Because of what a previous court that ruled it would be relevant to the case at hand. This leads to precedent.

Answer 2

Answer: c

Explanation: apex