When developing a counterclaim, you should A: not make your counterclaim’s evidence closely factual because you should not undermine your central argument. B:interview people who disagree with your argument’s claim in order to understand their opinions. C: thoroughly research the evidence to make sure you understand the facts behind the counterclaim. D: supply personal evidence and experience as to why you disagree with the counterclaim.

Respuesta :

When developing a counterclaim, you should "C: thoroughly research the evidence to make sure you understand the facts behind the counterclaim" but interviewing people can also be helpful since it gives you realistic arguments. 

In the process of argumentative writing, or any research, a very important step, aside from creating a claim and collecting the data to support this claim, is the creation of the counterclaim. A counterclaim is literally the way in which a writer contemplates that his argument, or claim, may be wrong, or partially wrong, and this adds veritability and trustworthiness to a research process because it shows that the writer did not just use his/her point of view and research to lay a claim, but considered other options as well and considered the fact that his/her statement may be untrue. What is important to consider, when building a counterclaim, however, it is important to consider all the points established by other writers, researchers or people in general. The correct answer would be C, because when doing research, a writer must consider all the facts, both that support and detract, from the claim in order to make his/her text balanced and not biased.