This is a psychology college question
the idea of operational definitions and the importance of using them, especially in psychology where we are trying to measure abstract concepts. So take the example of aggression. There is physical aggression (hitting, punching, kicking, etc.) and there is relational aggression (yelling, taunting, gossip, using the silent treatment, etc.). If a researcher published a study in which they had measured physical aggression, and another person tried to replicate this study, but instead only measured relational aggression, these two researchers might have very different findings. So we might conclude that the study on physical aggression was wrong, when really it is a good study, if one is looking at physical aggression. think of other concepts someone might try to study which could yield very different results based on how that concept was defined. This might be a little tricky at first, but I am confident that you can think of something. You can only talk about aggression if you think of something that I have not covered already (so I already covered physical and relational aggression - so you can't talk about those two...but if you can think of another form of aggression I didn't cover, you can compare it to either physical or relational aggression - but use this only as a last result). Otherwise, think of a variable (or two) we might want to study in psychology, and the different ways we could operationally define it. Answer shortly and briefly answering all the requirements correctly
