Respuesta :
Answer:
In Mc. Culloch v Maryland (1819), the Supreme court ruled that the actions of state government of Maryland were secondary to those of the federal government
Explanation:
In Mc. Culloch v Maryland (1819), the Supreme Court ruled that the actions of the federal government were superior to those of the state government of Maryland. This case revolved around the establishment of a national bank, which Maryland sought to tax.
The Supreme Court determined that the state's actions were unconstitutional because they interfered with the federal government's ability to carry out its constitutional duties. The ruling emphasized the supremacy of federal law over state law, affirming the principle of federalism in the United States. This landmark decision had significant implications for the balance of power between the federal and state governments.
Learn more about Supreme Court :
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
Final answer:
In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the Supreme Court ruled that state governments' actions were secondary to the federal government, establishing principles of implied powers and national supremacy. The decision affirmed Congress's authority to establish a national bank under the necessary and proper clause and limited state interference with federal operations.
Explanation:
In the landmark case of McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the Supreme Court ruled that the actions of the state governments were secondary to those of the federal government. This ruling emerged from a confrontation over the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States (BUS) when Maryland attempted to tax it. The significance of this ruling lies in the establishment of two important principles: the doctrine of implied powers and national supremacy.Chief Justice John Marshall's decision emphasized that Congress held the power to create a national bank under the "necessary and proper" clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. This clause allowed for the creation of "all means which are appropriate" to achieve "the legitimate ends" of the Constitution. Such measures were deemed essential for carrying out federal powers like regulating interstate commerce, collecting taxes, and borrowing money.Futhermore, under the supremacy clause of Article VI, the Court concluded that legitimate federal laws take precedence over conflicting state laws. Maryland's taxing efforts were seen as a violation of this principle, as it was an attempt to impede federal operations, encapsulated in Marshall's statement that "the power to tax is the power to destroy." Thus, the principles of implied powers and national supremacy were affirmed, limiting state interference in lawful national government activities and bolstering the federal government's role in promoting economic development.
