read this excerpt from the majority opinion on tinker v. des moines: if a regulation were adopted by school officials forbidding discussion of the Vietnam conflict, or the expression by any student of opposition to it anywhere on school property except as part of a prescribed classroom exercise, it would be obvious that the regulation would violate the constitutional right of students. What is the reasoning in this argument

The awnser is: If students were kept from discussing Vietnam in school, it would be an obvious violation of their rights, so not allowing them to wear armbands also violates their rights.

Answer Link

majocgonzalez majocgonzalez · Answer 2 · 2019-12-03T16:23:42+01:00

Answer:

It would violate the right to freedom of speech that everyone has.

Explanation:

If the school forbids students to talk about the Vietnam conflict that would be against the freedom of speech which is a principle that states that everyone can express their opinions without receiving a sanction or being censored. Because of that, the school can't adopt that regulation as they would be violating a right the students have to say what they think.