Question

Which statement is an example of finding common ground when addressing a counterclaim?

A. It's really not important that some people feel texting while driving isn't a big deal; it's a fact that it is dangerous and should be illegal.

B. While both sides agree that processed foods are more convenient, the damage they do to a person's health should not be ignored.

C. People who support the death penalty don't really care about the cost and cruelness of it; they are just vindictive and coldhearted.

D. Testing on animals has helped produce several vaccines and medicines that have saved countless human lives.

Answer 1

The answer is B. While both sides agree that processed foods are more convenient, the damage they do to a person's health should not be ignored. This statement says, "While both sides agree..." which shows that there is common ground between the opposing claims.

Answer 2

Answer: B. While both sides agree that processed foods are more convenient, the damage they do to a person's health should not be ignored.

"Finding common ground" means trying to find the areas in which both sides of a debate agree on. In this example, both sides on the debate on processed foods agree that this type of foods are more convenient. Finding common ground when addressing a counterclaim can ensure that both sides listen to the statement, instead of one side feeling alienated or ignored.