The missing reason in Statement 2 of the proof of the the Converse of the Isosceles Triangle Theorem that ∠PRS ≅ ∠QRS is;
A: Definition of angle bisector.
What are angle proofs in a triangle?
We are given that ∠P ≅ ∠Q and RS bisects ∠PQR.
From the attached image, we can say that;
In ΔPRS ΔQRS, SR ≅ SR Due to the theorem of reflexive property of congruence
We can say that PR = QR because of AAS congruency postulate.
Thus, we can conclude that ∠PRS ≅ ∠QRS due to the Definition of angle bisector
Read more about angle proofs in a triangle at; https://brainly.com/question/24839702