in 150 - 200 words summarize and rephrase this article, and write one sentence the most takeaway and one-sentence criticism from this article (Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approach to Assess the Project Quality Management in Project) Abstract Project quality management is all of the processes and activities needed to determine and achieve project quality. It includes the processes required to ensure that the project will satisfy the needs for which it was undertaken. Based on the identified evaluation criteria, a hierarchical structure of three dimensions and fifteen criteria is constructed, and a systematic approach with fuzzy ANP (FANP) was employed to assess the relative importance rates and rankings of these criteria. Discussions for the results are made and a brief conclusion is proposed. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to evaluation project quality management in project. The results found that there were interactive relations between all the criteria, where the dimension of "Quality planning" was the most influential dimensions; Furthermore, criteria "Project management plan", "Project Scope", and "Quality management plan" have the higher influences among each dimension, so we suggest to consider them as the major steps to promote the quality of project management. 1. Introduction Project quality management is all of the processes and activities needed to determine and achieve project quality. Quality is a slippery concept, argues Garvin (1992), "easy to visualize, and yet exasperatingly difficult to define." Based on Reeves and Bednar (1994), we explore three concepts of quality developed over time and discuss how these relate to the nature of projects, as expressed in the last section. Some of the concepts are tailored to embrace quality of goods and others of services. This is an important distinction in project contexts. Although a "project" may be defined as a manufacturing process type (Slack et al., 2004), it is true to say that projects can also be considered a "hybrid" of services and goods. In this article we understand goods as the outcome of the project, e.g. a factory, software code, or a new product, while services refers to the process of developing this outcome, the management of projects, its process, the way stakeholders are engaged in the decision making processes, etche rest of this paper is structured as follows: in Section 2, we discussed and found the components of project quality management background and requirements in order to construct the evaluation criteria based on literature review. In Section 3, the depiction and application of the Fuzzy theory and Fuzzy ANP are included. Section 4 shows an empirical study of assess the project quality management by using the proposed evaluation model. Finally the discussions and conclusions are presented in Section 5. This research adopts Fuzzy ANP, for assessing the project quality management in project. We prove that all criteria influence one another and find relative importance of essential criteria of PQM. In evaluating the PQM model, experts considered "Project management plan" to be the most important
criteria (the weight is 0.075). This shows that in the limited time and cost, program managers of organization should consider that first when they have to improve and keep the quality in project. Program managers should
also consider "Project Scope" because this is the second most important criterion in project quality management (Project Scope has a weight of 0.073). This study only discussed the structure of evaluation hierarchy and examination of importance of criteria. In a decision making process of project quality management, it should contain the process of alternatives
evaluation. Because it is not enough time to simulate the alternatives evaluation in this study, therefore, in the future work, we will combine more evaluation method, such as TOPSIS, VIKOR, etc. to calculate performance
value from each of dimension and criteria in project quality management.
