During the 1960s, U.S. steel firms argued they needed tariff protection because Germany and Japan were using new mils to make steel since their old mils were destroyed in World War II Essentially, this argument is a form of the A. anti-camping argument B. infant-industry argument C. national defense argument D. countering foreign subsidies argument.

Respuesta :

During the 1960s, U.S. steel firms argued they needed tariff protection because in World War II Essentially, this argument is a form of the anti-camping argument. So, the correct answer is option A.

When a nation has too much inventory, it will "dump" it on the market by selling it below cost, making it unprofitable for other companies to compete. Due to the opening of new mills, production costs could decrease, allowing Germany and Japan to sell steel to the United States for less money.

They seek to raise the price of imported goods relative to domestically produced items of equal value in order to increase domestic product sales and boost regional industry. Additionally, taxes are implemented to increase government revenue or to stop a bad activity (sin tax). Despite the fact that a tariff can both generate income for the government and shield domestic industry.

To know more about Tariff visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8000501

#SPJ4

ACCESS MORE