Question

you are a conservation biologist studying a population of cheetahs that has no genetic variation within it at any locus because it has been at a small population size for a very long time. these cheetahs are about to be introduced into a new area without cheetahs. you can, for an extra expense, make sure that the introduced cheetahs refuse to mate with close relatives in the generation that they are introduced in order to reduce inbreeding depression. given what you know about the cause of inbreeding depression, and assuming that there are no new mutations, is this extra expense justified?

Answer 1

Given the causes of inbreeding depression, and assuming that there are no new mutations, this extra expense is justifiable because inbreeding depression will occur in this population if relatives mate, causing more homozygous recessive production than if random mating of individuals

The cheetah is heading towards extinction They face this problem as if we as conservation biologists have to save the cheetah from extinction if they are introduced to a relative and they refuse to mate with them for the new generation to reduce inbreeding depression.

Yes, because inbreeding depression would occur in this population if relatives mated, causing the production of more homozygous recessive if random individuals mated as when this happens, the few individuals end up with inbreeding which reduces the size of the gene pool leads to the decrement of genetic variability and the harmful mutation which is very difficult to adapt these changes.

Inbreeding depression is a decrease in fitness with increased genome-wide homozygosity that occurs in offspring from related parents.

The question type multiple choice:

• a. Yes, because inbreeding depression does not depend on there being any genetic variation in a population.
• b. No, because of the absence of genetic variation.
• c. Yes, because inbreeding depression would occur in this population if relatives mated, causing the production of more homozygous recessives than if random individuals mated.
• d. No, because inbreeding would only result in the production of fewer heterozygotes in this population.

The answer is C

Learn more about inbreeding depression at https://brainly.com/question/13676032

#SPJ4