When preschoolers were forbidden to play with a very attractive toy, some received mild threats of punishment (that an adult would be 'annoyed'), and others received severe threats of punishment should they disobey (that an adult would be 'very, very angry) (Aronson & Carlsmith, 1963). Because they had threat condition experienced -, and changed their rating of the forbidden toy , children in the mild a. Insufficient external justification; more dissonance b. Ample external justification; more dissonance
c. Insufficient external justification; less dissonance d. Ample external justification; little dissonance

The process of coming up with explanations for one's conduct, beliefs, and attitudes that are not within one's own power is known as external justification.

When someone intentionally modifies an action, belief, or attitude in order to lessen cognitive dissonance, this is known as internal justification.
When a person searches internally for a reason to explain a behaviour because there isn't an external cause, this is known as the insufficient justification effect. By inwardly justifying an action when there is inadequate external reason, this impact lessens cognitive dissonance.
Some children received light punishment threats when they were told they couldn't play with a very appealing item, whereas others received severe punishment threats if they disobeyed (Aronson & Carlsmith, 1963).

The complete question is When preschoolers were forbidden to play with a very attractive toy, some received mild threats of punishment (that an adult would be 'annoyed'), and others received severe threats of punishment should they disobey (that an adult would be 'very, very angry') (Aronson & Carlsmith, 1963). Because they had _________________, children in the mild threat condition experienced ____________________, and changed their rating of the forbidden toy.

To learn more about external justification refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/14671284

#SPJ4