Question

which of these statements about u.s. v. lopez and u.s. v. morrison is not true? group of answer choices they addressed the gun free school zone act and the violence against women act. they illustrated some limits to congress' power under the commerce clause. they continued the trend established through commerce clause cases from 1937-1995. their basic principles seem to be contradicted by gonzales v. raich.

Answer 1

The Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 was declared illegal in United States v. Lopez (1995) because it went beyond what was allowed under the commerce clause.The correct option is B Gonzalez v. Raich.

In Gonzalez v. Raich (2005), the Supreme Court held that the Commerce Clause gave Congress the authority to make Raich's home-grown marijuana production and usage illegal, even if California law permitted it.

The federal government has the authority to control purely intrastate production that is intended for personal consumption if the refusal to regulate the non-commercial activity could harm interstate commerce, which is why the Supreme Court decided against the local marijuana grower.

Complete question:

which of these statements about u.s. v. lopez and u.s. v. morrison is not true? group of answer choices they addressed the gun free school zone act and the violence against women act. they illustrated some limits to congress' power under the commerce clause. they continued the trend established through commerce clause cases from 1937-1995. their basic principles seem to be contradicted by gonzales v. raich.when it enacted the Controlled Substances Act of

1970?

a. Shepard v. U.S.

b. Gonzalez v. Raich

C. Obergefell v. Ohio

To know more about Gonzalez v. Raich visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14991450

#SPJ4