Question

In the case of Griffin v. Wisconsin (1987), the U.S. Supreme Court held that it was legal for probation officers to use trickery and deception to find out whether probationers under their care were engaging in illegal activities.
True
False

Answer 1

True, The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Griffin v. Wisconsin (1987) that the probationers in her charge were participating in unlawful activity.

Why was the Griffin v. Wisconsin case so important?

It determined that the suppression request should not have been granted because probation reduces a person's reasonable expectation of privacy, allowing a probation officer to search a person's house without a warrant and with only "reasonable grounds" (instead of probable cause) to believe that...

What does Wisconsin's implied consent statute say?

As the name implies, drivers are deemed to have given their implied agreement to submit to a chemical test if requested by law enforcement only by operating a motor vehicle on a public road. Not just Wisconsin drivers are subject to this law.

To know more about Griffin visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29352302

#SPJ4