mrs. chan was diagnosed with alzheimer's disease 10 years ago. she is now 98 years old, confused, and needing help with activities of daily living. one day, she develops pneumonia, which is deliberately not treated. this might be termed a case of:

Respuesta :

intentionally not treated. It could be said that in this instance, a patient was intentionally allowed to die by not receiving artificial life support, such as a ventilator or feeding tube.

Why might passive euthanasia be preferable?

The key distinction between passive and active euthanasia is that the doctor does nothing to hasten the patient's demise in the latter. The patient dies from whatever illnesses he already has because the doctor does nothing.

Why does passive euthanasia unjustified?

The so-called practice of passive euthanasia is omitted. Therefore, passive euthanasia cannot actually be euthanasia because it cannot result in death. A fundamental weakness exists in the causation argument as well. The broad assertion at the center of the argument—that omissions cannot be causes—appears to be false, which is most essential.

To knwo more about passive euthanasia visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12030257

#SPJ4

ACCESS MORE
EDU ACCESS
Universidad de Mexico