intentionally not treated. It could be said that in this instance, a patient was intentionally allowed to die by not receiving artificial life support, such as a ventilator or feeding tube.
The key distinction between passive and active euthanasia is that the doctor does nothing to hasten the patient's demise in the latter. The patient dies from whatever illnesses he already has because the doctor does nothing.
The so-called practice of passive euthanasia is omitted. Therefore, passive euthanasia cannot actually be euthanasia because it cannot result in death. A fundamental weakness exists in the causation argument as well. The broad assertion at the center of the argument—that omissions cannot be causes—appears to be false, which is most essential.
To knwo more about passive euthanasia visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12030257
#SPJ4