We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment. this disposition makes unnecessary any discussion whether such segregation also violates the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. â€"brown v. board of education, chief justice earl warren what is the main purpose of the passage?

Respuesta :

Separate institutions of higher learning are fundamentally unfair. So, we conclude that the plaintiffs and other parties in a similar situation who were the target of the actions.

What legal ruling said that the notion of separate but equal has no place in the realm of public education?

Committee on Education (1954, 1955) The five different cases that the U.S. Supreme Court considered involving the topic of segregation in public schools were collectively referred to as Brown v. Board of Education.

According to a court decision, we draw the conclusion that the separate but equal theory has no place in the realm of public education. Are different educational facilities fundamentally unfair?

347 U.S. 483 Board of Education of Topeka (1954) States are not allowed to separate kids in public schools on the basis of race, according to the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This indicated a rejection of the "separate but equal" Plessy v. Ferguson principle.

To know more about public education visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/23566306

#SPJ4

ACCESS MORE