Citizens United changed campaign finance laws in the accompanying ways:
It eliminated the money related limits that enterprises and people can spend to impact a political decision autonomously.
It expanded how much cash was spent on elections.
It brought about a few affluent people having excessive impact in elections.
Citizens United v FEC was a 2010 case about the conflict connecting with the sum that can be spent on elections. The Supreme Court at last managed 5-4 and expressed that the Primary Alteration gave privileges to organizations to spend on elections and that there was no restriction on such sum.
Accordingly, the financial furthest reaches that corporations and people can spend to autonomously impact a political decision were eliminated. This guaranteed that there was an expansion in how much cash that was spent on elections.
Likewise, the choice by the Supreme Court brought about few rich people having excessive impact in elections.
All in all, Citizens United changed campaign finance laws as the cutoff points on the sum that can be spent on elections were eliminated.
to know more about the Supreme court click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4