Respuesta :
The statement which best describes the precedent set by the Supreme Court in New York Times v. United States regarding government censorship is: Government censorship is almost always unconstitutional. The answer to your question is B.
The statement that best describes the precedent set by the United States Supreme Court in New York Times v. United States regarding government censorship is: Government censorship is almost always unconstitutional.
The New York Times vs. United States was a landmark judgment delivered by the US Supreme Court in 1971. In its ruling, the Supreme Court granted the New York Times the right to publish its publication without government interference or censorship
Further Explanation
The Supreme Court also ruled that the government attempt to prevent the New York Times from publishing its document violates the first amendment. The courts maintained the fact that government censorship is always unconstitutional and it’s meant to violate the right to publish without censorship.
The ruling of the United States Supreme Court was regarded as the victory for the freedom of the press.
The case also is known as "the pentagon papers case" started when the US government approached the court to prevent the New York Times from publishing some documents that detailed the activities of the United States in Vietnam. President Nixon at the time maintained that prior restraint became necessary as the publication of the classified document could pose a security threat to the United States.
However, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the New York Times and declared the actions of government as unconstitutional.
LEARN MORE:
- Which statement best describes the precedent set by the Supreme Court in New York Times v. United States regarding government censorship? https://brainly.com/question/10042950
- Which best describes the precedent set by the Supreme Court in New York Times v. United States regarding government censorship? https://brainly.com/question/1762718
KEYWORDS:
- supreme court
- new york
- united states
- ruling
- unconstitutional