RS2. Given: ZP ZQ andProve: PR=QRSupply the missing reason in Statement 1 of the proof of the the Converse of the Isosceles Triangle Theorem.Begin with isosceles APRQ with ZP ZQ. Construct RS, a bisector of ZPRQ.bisects ZPQR.R

We are given the following triangle:
We are given that:
[tex]\angle P=\angle Q[/tex]Since RS is a bisector this means that:
[tex]\angle PRS=\angle SRQ[/tex]Also, since S is a midpoint of PQ:
[tex]PS=SQ[/tex]By the reflexive property we have:
[tex]RS=RS[/tex]Since we have two pairs of congruent angles this means that:
[tex]\angle PSR=\angle QSR[/tex]Therefore, by SAS theorem of congruency:
[tex]\Delta PSR\cong\Delta QSR[/tex]Since the triangles are congruent this means that all of its sides are congruent too, therefore:
[tex]PR=QR[/tex]And thus we have concluded the proof.