The "content neutral" as defined by the Supreme Court is that it was unnecessary given that the federal government was given only a small set of explicitly delegated powers.
Content neutral can be described as the laws which is been used in handling the situations that can be associated to the expression even though the there is no regard to the message of the expression.
It should be noted that this law id been used in country in the process of regulating only the time as well as the and also relate with a particular content.
In conclusion as regards to the case above, "content neutral" as defined by the Supreme Court is that it was unnecessary given that the federal government was given only a small set of explicitly delegated powers because it is related to an expression at a particular time.
Learn more about Supreme Court at:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ1