Religious texts are typically old and difficult to understand in light of the complexity of modern culture. As a result, religion as a system of ethics does not offer particular ethical advice to particular ethical conundrums.
The first horn of the conundrum is overcome by the divine command theory. The second horn of the paradox may, however, strike a deadly blow at this point, killing the hypothesis.
If the proponent of the divine command theory is correct in their assertion that "God commands us to love our neighbor since it is morally good that we should do so," then moral goodness is distinct from God's will and moral facts, in so far as as God is now subject to such facts, so to speak, stand over God.
God is no longer completely sovereign as a result. One solution is to assert that God is subject to moral standards in the same manner that he is subject to logical standards, which almost everyone agrees does not infringe upon his sovereignty.
Therefore, the majority of religious texts are old and challenging to understand in light of the complexity of modern culture. As a result, religion does not offer particular ethical advice for specific ethical conundrums.
Read more about divine command theory, here
https://brainly.com/question/24356569
#SPJ1