The reason why the comment by Tina was unwise was because A. Tina's statement could be taken as an implied contract to keep the worker in future, making it hard to dismiss the worker if problems arise.
Why should Tina not have said that?
Tina essentially gave the applicant an implied contract because she gave the applicant terms that they needed to abide by in order to get the job and to keep it.
Those terms revolved around loyalty. This means that if the company needed to dismiss the worker in future, the worker could go to court and argue that they deserve to keep their job because they have given the loyalty that was a requisite according to Tina.
Find out more on implied contracts at https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1