The advice about alternative actions, considering the constraints of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct is illustrated below
How yo illustrate the information?
It should benoted that if Jack and Jill gang up on Bill, John may lose the work that was going to Phil. Then this situation brought a typical 'Who is the client?' situation.
The appropriate relationships are individual engagements of John with Jack and Bill, because if the corporation were not a client, Jo would have confronted essentially a similar circumstance. In this circumstance, Jon is in an impossible-to-win condition.
In case, Jon does not tell him, he may lose the commitment and a generous offer of his own salary incidentally. On the off chance that Jo thinks about guidelines as the most noteworthy part of moral conduct, he will dismiss the demand of B with a thoughtful and influential clarification of the expert reason. A happy conclusion for this approach depends upon Bill's understanding of the typical condition he made for Jon.
Learn more about professional conduct on:
https://brainly.com/question/22596931
#SPJ1