Although it aligns with good conventional morals that politicians speak unequivocally in a bid to be elected and hence is a moral obligation, the reverse is the case.
It follows from the definition of speaking equivocally that it involves speaking in such a manner so that the speaker's take is subject to two or more interpretations and usually used to mislead or confuse an equivocal statement.
Politicians, in a bid to be elected drop this moral obligation of speaking unequivocally and hence, speak equivocally as this is supported by their right to speak.
Read more on politics:
https://brainly.com/question/633543
#SPJ1