Read the statement.

Drones have the ability to save every animal in the world.

Why would it be wrong to include this statement in an argument essay about “Drones Put Spying Eyes in the Sky”?

Drones Put Spying Eyes in the Sky


The statement is insufficient because it contains only one fact.


The statement is irrelevant because it relies on oversimplification.


The statement relies on false information.


The statement relies on bandwagon appeals.

Respuesta :

It would it be wrong to include this statement in an argument essay about “Drones Put Spying Eyes in the Sky” as the statement relies on false information.

The statement is providing wrong information as every animal in the world cannot be saved by drone technology. Drones are used to detect the hunters and save animals from them. They can be used for search and rescue, however drones cannot save every animal.

Drones are quite useful for monitoring wildlife because they are outfitted "with cameras, laser lights, GPS, altimeters", and other devices but saving every animal is impossible for any technology and it's unrealistic.

Thus, the correct option is C.

To learn more about “Drones Put Spying Eyes in the Sky” here

https://brainly.com/question/12299799

#SPJ1

ACCESS MORE
EDU ACCESS