the Court ruled that the harmless error doctrine applies to cases involving admissibility of involuntary confessions.
An involuntary confession that results from overwhelming police behavior rather than the defendant's free will is referred to as a pressured confession. Because the confession was not the result of the accused's free will, it is involuntary.
The Court decided in Fulminante that situations regarding the admissibility of involuntary confessions fall under the harmless error theory.
It is crucial to assess the admissibility of Fulminante's confession to Sarivola in light of the finding by five Justices that the harmless error analysis extends to coerced confessions. For example, see Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co., 491 U. S. 1, 45 (1989) (WHITE, J., concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part).
Learn more about Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona:
https://brainly.com/question/3703825?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4