Alejandro is writing an argumentative essay about corporate advertising in public schools. Which evidence best supports
Alejandro's claim that corporate advertising in public schools would be an unfair practice?
OA. A study conducted by a mass communication journal shows that children lack the experience and knowledge
to evaluate the purpose of the persuasive advertising appeals, making students particularly vulnerable targets.
B. Students are more likely to buy and use products and services from the advertisement that is most appealing
to them; if they are exposed to these at their school, they will not buy anything they see outside the school.
OC. Statistics show that children aged 13-19 view advertisements more than any other age group, which means
that their purchasing power will increase if they are exposed to more advertisements while attending school.
OD. Most school-aged children are unable to buy the products that would be advertised in their schools; therefore,
using such ads would distract students from their school work by shifting their focus to consumer products.

The evidence that best supports Alejandro's claim that corporate advertising in public schools would be an unfair practice is when the purpose of the persuasive advertising appeals makes students a vulnerable targets.

What is a corporate advertising?

This refers to an advertising that attempts to create an image or communicate with specific audiences about a product.

The unfair practice of the corporate advertising occurs when the purpose of the persuasive advertising appeals makes students a vulnerable targets.

Therefore, the Option B is correct.

Read more about corporate advertising

brainly.com/question/1658517

#SPJ1