Question

Unfortunately, saving elephants had a negative economic effect on some people. In 1999, in response to pressure from business
interests that were losing money because of the ban on the ivory trade, CITES allowed limited trade in stockpiled tusks. Ivory that
already had been harvested from elephants could once again be bought and sold. But disaster for the African elephant followed.
Poachers, or illegal hunters, rushed to kill more elephants. Many people had foreseen that illegal trading of ivory would flourish again if
any trading at all were allowed. Following the CITES decision, African clephants died in large numbers. A 2014 New York Times
editorial reported that approximately 30,000 to 35,000 African elephants were killed each year. Only a complete ban of the ivory trade
can save the African clephant from extinction.
Which type of logical fallacy appears in this excerpt?

Post hoc fallacy

Cherry picking

Fallacy of the single cause

Reversing causal direction

Answer 1

The logical fallacy that appears in this excerpt is D. Reversing causal direction.

What is a logical fallacy?

It should be noted that logical fallacy simply means an informal fallacy that makes an argument invalid.

In this case, the logical fallacy that appears in this excerpt is reversing causal direction. It is believed that the elephants resulted in the problem.

Learn more about fallacy on:

https://brainly.com/question/1971023

#SPJ1