Some critics believe that scene 5 was not part of the original text but was added to the play later. What is the purpose of scene 5? Write a review (a paragraph between 5-8 sentences) in which you argue either for or against the inclusion of scene 5. Your response should provide evidence from the play to support your response/opinion. In addition, you should respond to TWO of your peers. Your response to your peers should be between two to three sentences to earn full credit.

The question wants to analyze your ability to read and interpret a text. For that reason, I won't write the review for you, but I will show you how to write it.

First, you'll need to read the play and understand what scene 5 adds to the plot and how the play would be different if that scene didn't exist.

You can search for articles that analyze the play and help you identify the importance of scene 5.

After that, you can write your review.

Steps to write the review.

Show how scene 5 modifies play.
Show whether this is positive or negative.
Show evidence that scene 5 is important or not.

You didn't present the play this question refers to, but I hope the above information can help you.

More information about reviews at the link:

https://brainly.com/question/6205437