Question

The Court of Appeals held that in light of these authorities, Alvarado's age and experience must be a factor. . . . A minor with no criminal record would be more likely to feel coerced by police tactics and conclude he is under arrest than would an experienced adult, the Court of Appeals reasoned. This required extra "safeguards. " According to Justice Kennedy, why did the Court of Appeals overturn Alvarado’s conviction? Check all that apply. The police used extra protections for him. The police coerced his confession. Minors require special legal protections. He was in custody because he concluded that he was under arrest. He was experienced enough to understand his rights.

Answer 1

According to Justice Kennedy, the reason why the Court of Appeals overturned Alvarado’s conviction is:

• The police coerced his confession
• He was in custody because he concluded that he was under arrest.

What is a Conviction?

This refers to a legal verdict whereby a person is found guilty of an offence in a competent court of law and given a sentence.

With this in mind, we can see that the case of Alvarado was not one that was very straightforward because of the feelings of being in custody and being coerced by police tactics and thus the verdict was overturned because the Court said that being "in custody" was a matter of law, not of whether Alvarado believed he was in custody.

Read more about convictions here:
https://brainly.com/question/25480701