Question

Both leopold and matthai believe that we must protect the environment and and preserve our natural resources so the good life is possible for future generations. Discuss a solution that each of them proposes, describe how they are similar and how they are different, and explain which author makes the most compelling argument in your opinion.

Answer 1

Leopoldo and Matthai's arguments in relation to environmental preservation are similar in the sense that they have the same scope, which is the protection of the environment to maintain the quality of life for current and future generations.

Regarding the differences in the basis of the argument between the two, Maathai builds his argument through a personal discourse, whereas Leopoldo's argument is related to a general problem, such as the lack of information available to the population on the subject.

Triple Botton Line

It corresponds to fundamental aspects that must be integrated into societies and their institutions in order to promote the sustainable development of natural resources and society. The Triple Botton Line is formed by the pillars:

1. Social
2. Economic
3. Environmental

Therefore, Leopoldo and Matthai's arguments are positive and contribute to the dissemination of information and the promotion of discussion about the importance of environmental preservation and its impacts on everyone's lives.

Find out more information about sustainability here:

https://brainly.com/question/25713190