Question

Rachael was arrested by the police on suspicion of possession of a controlled substance. She was informed of her Miranda rights. Rachael waived her right to remain silent and confessed to the crime after a brief period of police interrogation. Her confession is: A. inadmissible because it was obtained in violation of her Fifth Amendment rights. B. admissible, according to the "search incident to a lawful arrest" exception to Miranda. C. admissible, according to Supreme Court precedent. D. inadmissible because it was obtained in violation of her Fourth Amendment rights.

Answer 1

Based on the given scenario, we can see that Rachael's confession is:

• C. admissible, according to Supreme Court precedent.

What are Human Rights?

This refers to those inalienable privileges which a human being which cannot be taken away unless under special circumstances and some of them include:

• Right to life
• Right to fair hearing
• Freedom of assembly, etc

With this in mind, we can see that Rachael waived her Fofth Amendment rights and confessed to a crime after brief interrogation by the police so this is admissible, according to Supreme Court precedent.

Read more about human rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/1288668