Question

Making an ethical judgment necessarily assumes that we can possess moral knowledge (i.e., that we can
really know whether something is right or wrong based on more than opinion). Metaethics explores this issue
and we have identified a number of competing philosophies with different answers to the question of whether
moral knowledge is possible. Only one of them allows for us to have objective justification for our judgments,
however. Which is it?
Select one:
a. Cultural metaethical relativism
b. Temporal metaethical relativism
c. Metaethical absolutism
d. Metaethical emotivism
Clear my choi

Answer 1

There are different kinds of theory. The option that allows for us to have objective justification for our judgments is Metaethical absolutism.

What does an absolutist believe?

Moral Absolutism is known to be the ethical belief that there are some measures of absolute standards through which moral questions can be looked into, and that some actions are right or wrong, even with the context of the act.

This Absolutism principle is the belief that moral principles must be applied the same way in all cases and cultures.

Learn more about  Metaethics  from

https://brainly.com/question/9260521