How do the testimonies of Göring and Jodl compare? Both defendants are remorseful; they confess to committing war crimes. Both defendants claim that no war crimes or crimes against humanity were committed. Both defendants state that they had no choice; they had to follow orders. Both defendants claim that they had no knowledge of the crimes committed.

Respuesta :

The correct statement is that the testimonies of Goring and Alfred Jodl were similar in the sense that both the defendants that they had no choice and had to follow the orders. So, the correct option is C.

Goring was accused of spreading conspiracies to murders and disturbance of peace. Similar was the case that happened with Alfred Jodl.

Testimonies of Göring and Jodl

  • In the court trials that were conducted on both the defendants, they claimed that they were under undue influence and had to follow the orders of the high command.

  • It was stated that had they not committed these crimes, they would have been debarred from the nationality and had to serve the orders being imposed by them due to their position in the governance.

Hence, the correct option is C that the testimonies of Göring and Jodl compare in a way that both the defendants stated that they had no other choice and had to follow the orders to commit such crimes.

Learn more about testimonies of Göring and Jodl here:

https://brainly.com/question/15818877

Answer:

its c

Explanation:

ACCESS MORE