Question

Which best describes the difference between the free-soil territories and those that had popular sovereignty?
ОА.
A territory that was free soil was closed to slavery, while one that had popular sovereignty was allowed to vote on the slavery
issue
OB.
A territory that was free soil was open to slavery, while one that had popular sovereignty was allowed to vote on the slavery
issue.
OC.
A territory that had popular sovereignty was open to slavery, while one that was free soil was allowed to vote on the slavery
issue
OD.
A territory that had popular sovereignty was closed to slavery, while one that was free soil was allowed to vote on the slavery
issue.
ОЕ
A territory that was free soil accepted the Homestead Act of 1862, while one that had popular sovereignty did not.

Answer 1

Answer:

ОА.

A territory that was free soil was closed to slavery, while one that had popular sovereignty was allowed to vote on the slavery issue.

Explanation:

Popular Sovereignty was an idea first formulated Lewis Cass, and later championed by Stephen Douglas. A good idea in principle, that stated a territory's right to pick to be a slave or free states, this solution was favored by political moderates. Free Soil politicians wanted incoming American territories to be free.

Hope this helps : ). Brainliest please!