Using the z-distribution, it is found that since the absolute value of the test statistic is greater than the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected.
At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportions are the same, that is, their subtraction is 0, hence:
[tex]H_0: p_1 - p_2 = 0[/tex]
At the alternative hypothesis, it is tested if they are different, that is, their subtraction is not 0, hence:
[tex]H_1: p_1 - p_2 \neq 0[/tex]
The proportions and their respective standard errors are given by:
[tex]p_1 = 0.25, s_1 = \sqrt{\frac{0.25(0.75)}{120}} = 0.0395[/tex]
[tex]p_2 = 0.37, s_2 = \sqrt{\frac{0.37(0.63)}{150}} = 0.0394[/tex]
For the distribution of the difference, the mean and the standard error are given by:
[tex]\overline{p} = p_2 - p_1 = 0.37 - 0.25 = 0.12[/tex]
[tex]s = \sqrt{s_1^2 + s_2^2} = \sqrt{0.0395^2 + 0.0394^2} = 0.0558[/tex]
The test statistic is given by:
[tex]z = \frac{\overline{p} - p}{s}[/tex]
In which [tex]p = 0[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis.
Hence:
[tex]z = \frac{\overline{p} - p}{s}[/tex]
[tex]z = \frac{0.12 - 0}{0.0558}[/tex]
[tex]z = 2.15[/tex]
The critical value for a two-tailed test, as we are testing if two values are different, with a significance level of 0.15 is [tex]|z^{\ast}| = 1.4395[/tex].
Since the absolute value of the test statistic is greater than the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected.
A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/25676691