Answer:
Rainsford was justified in shooting Zaroff because he was acting in self-defense. Rainsford was unsure whether Zaroff would follow through on his promise to let him free, so he killed him just to be safe. Some may argue that it was unjustified, and that he could have simply departed because he had won the game. If he didn't murder Zaroff, though, many more men would fall victim to his dangerous game. Zaroff had already murdered a large number of people and would be dangerous if he was allowed to survive. Rainsford behaved in self-defense as well as for the sake of others. As a result, he was justified in assassinating Zaroff.
Explanation:
Here is a paragraph and it is all original you can do a plagerism checker hopefully this is helpful I will add more if I can
