Question

Which of the following was a consequence of one-party dominance in Texas?
O a.
Only one party's candidates were listed on ballots for all elections during this period.
O b. Since the outcome of all elections was known, the elections were cancelled to save scarce resources.
O C. Primaries ended up being irrelevant to both parties.
O d. General elections tended to be non-competitive during this period.

Answer 1

One-party dominance in Texas has resulted in: d. General elections tending to be non-competitive during this period.

Recall:

• One-party dominance is a situation whereby a political party continues to have its candidates emerge winners against other political parties' candidates in elections.

Texas used to be a two-party state in the 19th and 18th centuries. During those period, elections used to be very competitive when compared to other southern states in the United states.

However, for most of the 20th century, elections have been dominated by the Republican Party, thereby making general elections to be non-competitive.

Therefore, this one-party dominance in Texas has resulted in: d. General elections tending to be non-competitive during this period.

Learn more here:

https://brainly.com/question/15079176