Question

Which "rule" is typical in a writing workshop or peer review session?
The writer of the draft should introduce it by explaining why he or she wrote it that way.
Each reader must speak only once and for a set and equal period of time.
The writer should just listen to the readers' feedback, without explaining or justifying.
Readers (reviewers) should argue their points of view as in a formal debate.

Answer 1

A peer review session is a formal gathering of colleagues in the same discipline who discuss literature or research that was prepared by one of them. The aim is to improve the structure and content of the text through their opinions. A rule that that is typical in a peer review session is;

• The writer of the draft should introduce it by explaining why he or she wrote it that way.

At the beginning of a peer review session, it is expected that the person who wrote the draft reads it aloud before his peers.

After the reading, he can add comments on why he or she included certain points or structured the article the way it is. The peers make their notes during this introduction and later offer their comments on it.

Peer review sessions are important because they improve the quality and fidelity of articles.

Learn more here:

https://brainly.com/question/18936429

Answer 2

Answer:

The writer should just listen to the readers' feedback, without explaining or justifying.

Explanation: Took Test