Respuesta :
Answer:
This is valid I'm pretty sure
Step-by-step explanation:
The is is because Bugs Bunny is disproved and he finds that it is not duck season, so it would be valid. I hope I'm right.
Answer:
The argument would be valid
Step-by-step explanation:
Let p = "It is duck season"
Let q = "My name is Bugs Bunny"
The formation would be:
p ∨ q
~ p
∴ ~q
If you made a truth value table, the critical row (means where the premises are true, in this case it would be ~p) has true premise and a true conclusion. Thus the argument is valid.