Marie Kelly sued the Zaks after she was injured in a headon collision. The
Automobile that hit her was driven by Donald Gwinnell. Donald had been at the
Zaks’ home immediately before the accident and had been served a large
amount of alcohol by the Zaks. The Zaks then allowed Donald to drive himself
home during which time he struck the car driven by Marie Kelly. If state law
does not impose liability on the Zaks for Donald’s acts,can the courts hold them
liable for Kelly’s injuries? Why or why not? [Kelly v. Grinnell, 476 A. 2d 1219
(N.J.1984)]
