3. Which parts of the interview with Tyson show that his tone is playful when discussing the topic of
Pluto with the general public, even though he may take it more seriously the rest of the time?
1
4. A key part of scientific inquiry is reexamining beliefs and theories. Do you see any value in questioning
and ultimately changing Pluto's planet status? Explain your answer.

Although you didn't show it, we can see that his question refers to the interview given by Neil Degrasse Tyson, about the change of status of the planet Pluto.

Through this interview we can see that:

Tyson has a great knowledge of space and its elements.
He is in favor of changing the status of the planet Pluto from being a planet in the solar system to becoming a dwarf planet.
He wants to scientifically inform the reasons for this change, however, he knows that different people will listen to the interview and he wants everyone to understand.
Then he presents all the concepts about Pluto's status change in a very humorous way, stating that as a dwarf planet Pluto will be happier

He claims that Pluto was not happy in the solar system because it had to beg its place and cause pity to stay there, however, as a dwarf planet it is in the place he deserves.

Tyson's type of approach is very effective because it attracts public attention, but it keeps scientific terms serious and important.

There are several reasons why Pluto should not be considered a planet in the solar system. You should research these reasons and establish your opinion about them, showing whether you agree or disagree with Pluto's status change.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/1887828?referrer=searchResults